HortTechnology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 April 2008
Published in HortTechnology 18: 196-319 (2008)
© 2008 American Society for Horticultural Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schuch, U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Teegerstrom, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schuch, U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Teegerstrom, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schuch, U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Teegerstrom, T.

Research Reports

Capillary Mats for Maintenance of Plants in the Retail Nursery

Ursula K. Schuch1,4, Jack J. Kelly2 and Trent Teegerstrom3

1 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
2 Pima County Cooperative Extension, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719
3 Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721

Additional Index Words. water conservation • irrigation • container plants • economics

Capillary mats and overhead sprinkler irrigation were used in a simulated retail environment to maintain annual and perennial plants in containers for various time periods during summer and winter. Combining the results from both seasons, four species with dense canopies had larger canopy sizes when maintained on the capillary mats, three species requiring more drainage had larger canopies with overhead irrigation, and five species were unaffected by irrigation systems. Substrate electrical conductivity was higher for some species in winter for plants on capillary mats, conserving fertilizer compared with overhead irrigation. Most species tolerated either irrigation system well. Water application was 71% less in summer and 62% less in winter to maintain plants on capillary mats compared with overhead irrigation. An economic analysis compared the investment required for setup and maintenance of plants in a retail situation using hand watering, overhead sprinkler, or capillary mat irrigation. The partial budget indicates that capillary mats are a labor-saving alternative to hand watering in a retail nursery and will compensate for the higher initial investment within less than 1 year. The overhead sprinklers are the most cost-effective system of the three because of less costly initial set-up and maintenance than the capillary mats; however, they are not a true alternative to hand watering in a retail situation because they interfere with customer traffic and worker activities.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Journal of the ASHS HortScience HortTechnology ASHS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Horticultural Science.